Larry Crowne (3/10 for guys;
7/10 for chicks)
by Tony Medley
Run time 95 minutes.
OK for children.
This is another
chick flick apparently designed to drive men who somehow find themselves
in the theater stark-raving mad. The cast consists of two fading
superstars, Tom Hanks and Julia Roberts. Roberts is a veteran of
deplorable chick flicks, her last being 2010's excruciating Eat Pray
Love. The fact that Hanks has avoided chick flicks doesn't mean that
he's been in good movies, however. His last was the laughable Angels
and Demons (2009).
Although Hanks
has the reputation as an easy-going nice guy, his films are often filled
with leftwing ideology. But he doesn't limit his biases to politics,
Angels and Demons and its predecessor, The da Vinci Code
(2006), were both anti-Catholic. Anybody who would star in such
films must necessarily be tarred with the brush of intolerance,
especially since the films were so obviously bigoted, if not defamatory,
despite the fact that the author of the books ardently defended the
accuracy of Da Vinci in spite of overwhelming evidence to the
contrary.
This film,
written
(with Nia Vardalos) and
directed by Hanks, has a political bias that is right up his alley. The
basis of the film is that Hanks is a wonderful employee of UMart, a
Walmart clone. He's been awarded "employee of the month" award 8 times
and when he's called to the office he's expecting another one. But when
he gets to the meeting he's confronted by all his superiors (all shown
to be dopes) who say the corporation is downsizing and getting rid of
everyone without a college degree.
This is not the
way corporations operate. In order to make his point of the evil of the
corporate world, Hanks has it backwards. When the economy goes bad and
earnings dive, corporations don't fire the lowly paid employees like
Hanks, they look at highly compensated workers to dump in order to
replace them by people earning less. So in the real world, the three
dopes firing Tom would be the ones to go and Tom would take their jobs.
But Hanks obviously has a political agenda and he takes this movie,
which he wrote and directed, as a way to make it.
The rest of the
story is good-natured Tom going to college where he meets a speech
teacher, Julia Roberts, and a typically precocious coed, Gugu Mbatha-Raw,
who, despite her tender years, has all the answers as to how middle-aged
Tom should dress and walk and talk and lead his life. There is
apparently a romance between Tom and Juilia, but I couldn't see any
feeling between them. If two superstars can't create chemistry where
none exists, do they really deserve the reputation as superstars?
The film has
other annoyances. Gugu's boy friend is the leader of a gang that rides
motorbikes. The film has several scenes with these tough-looking guys
tooling around like Marlon Brando in The Wild One (1953) and
Peter Fonda and Dennis Hopper in Easy Rider (1969). Marlon and
Peter and Dennis looked tough and menacing. These guys look silly, like
if anyone crossed them they'd hit him with their purses.
Roberts makes it
a point to laugh whole-heartedly in virtually every film in which she
appears. Bad idea. Whenever she cackles that insincere laugh is like
fingernails dragged across a blackboard.
This was such a
drag I spent most of my time cataloging the product placements that
allowed the film to be financed. Apple, Coca-Cola, even the Tam O
Shanter restaurant, were among the many who gave money to be promoted in
this thing.
On the positive
side, it is sweet, so it's possible that chicks might like this, but
then they probably liked Mona Lisa Smile, a 2003 Roberts effort,
too. |