Rush Hour 3 (1/10)
by Tony Medley
If you want to
see a film that epitomizes the vapidity of the American film-making
industry, this is the one. This is the third in a puzzling series of
films; puzzling because they have all been of a kind, awful. But the
first reached 242 on the all time gross list and the second moved up to
131. So a third was inevitable.
They are all
alike. Lee (Jackie Chan) is a hard working LAPD cop now. His buddy,
Carter (Chris Tucker), has been demoted to traffic cop. But they hook
up; otherwise there would be no movie.
I was ready to
leave within the first minute as we see Carter directing traffic in
downtown Los Angeles, causing pileups, but more interested in hitting on
two women whose car he has just ruined by his maladroit directions. All
the while he is clowning and acting like a 21st Century
Stepin Fetchit, a character he continues to ape throughout the film.
There is a
ridiculous plot that takes them to Paris so we can see some scenery. The
film is chock full of silly stunts, greatly enhanced by CGI.
As with the
first two, this is directed by Brett Ratner, who has yet to make a
watchable movie. He was also responsible for 2004’s After the Sunset,
in which he took a cast with exceptional talent (Pierce Brosnan,
Selma Hayek, Don Cheadle, and Naomie Harris, among others) and produced
a debacle that most people should be thankful they missed. It was so bad
it got an 18% rating on Rottentomatoes.com.
I don’t know
what is worse, the horrible script by Jeff Nathanson, Ratner’s
direction, or Tucker’s acting. Nathanson wrote the first two, also, in
addition to turkeys like Catch Me If You Can (2002) and The
Terminal (2004). Of course, both of those were directed by
Steven Spielberg, who has perfected the craft of the terminally long,
boring movie. So it’s difficult to know if Nathanson was to blame for
bad scripts or Spielberg was to blame for bad directing and editing and
failure to cut. Probably both.
Here there is
no debate that the script is terrible. Nothing Tucker does is funny. He
is trying so hard that it wears you out to just watch him make such an
effort to make people laugh. What he made me do was cringe.
There really is
no acting in this film. Let’s face it, Jackie Chan may be a nice guy and
good at kung fu, or whatever you want to call that martial arts madness,
but an actor he’s not. Max von Sydow shows up, but he hasn’t had to
actually act much since Ingmar Bergman’s Smultronstället (1957,
better known as Wild Strawberries). He’s still playing the
unemotional assassin he perfected in Three Days of the Condor
(1975).
The film is
nothing if not predictable. There is not one iota of tension, and the
bad guy is so obvious that when he makes his first appearance, he seems
to be yelling, “I’m the bad guy!” If you can’t pick him out, you need to
see more trash like this.
August 6, 2007 |